Site Logo
Microdata Portal
  • Datasets
  • Home
  • Catalog
  • Citations
  • RELI SKY
  • Collections
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Contact us
  • Login
    Login
APHRC Logo
    Home / Central Data Catalog / DIGNITAS-USTAWI-HB-01 / variable [F11]
central

Stawisha Instructional Leadership Institute Homabay

Kenya, 2020 - 2021
Get Microdata
Reference ID
Dignitas-Ustawi-HB-01
Producer(s)
Dignitas Limited
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Study website
Created on
Feb 20, 2024
Last modified
Feb 20, 2024
Page views
32428
Downloads
165
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Downloads
  • Data files
  • 2_Instructional_Leadership_Baseline_HB
  • 4_Instructional_Leadership_Competency_Rubric_HB
  • 5_School_Reopening_Recovery_Baseline_HB
  • 7_Literacy_Assessment_HB
  • 8_Numeracy_Assessment_HB
  • 10_Lesson_Observation_HB
  • 11_Instructional_Leadership_Endline_HB
  • 12_EO_Coaching_HB
  • 3_Lesson_Observation_Coaching_HB
  • 6_School_Reopening_Recovery_Endline_HB
  • 9_21st_Century_Skills_Assessment_HB
  • 1_Lesson_Observation_Baseline_HB

Section Notes5 (AV)

Data file: 3_Lesson_Observation_Coaching_HB

Overview

Valid: 112
Invalid: 35
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Width: 2
Range: 1 - 89
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category Cases
1 Active class 1
0.7%
2 All learners with text books 1
0.7%
3 Alwsys group learners 1
0.7%
4 Chorus responses are evident but not much of group work 1
0.7%
5 Class control is good 1
0.7%
6 Developing notes as he was teachimg 1
0.7%
7 Discussion groupings 1
0.7%
8 Effective group work 1
0.7%
9 Effective learner engagement 1
0.7%
10 Good class control 1
0.7%
11 Good readers 1
0.7%
12 Good work 5
3.4%
13 Group work 7
4.8%
14 Group work & pairing up the learners 1
0.7%
15 Group work - Time talk 1
0.7%
16 Group work Activities 1
0.7%
17 Group work be emphasized 1
0.7%
18 Group work done well 1
0.7%
19 Group work encouragement 1
0.7%
20 Group work noted 1
0.7%
21 Group work seen 1
0.7%
22 Group work to be intensified 1
0.7%
23 Group work very necessary 1
0.7%
24 Group work well don 1
0.7%
25 Group work well done 1
0.7%
26 Group work, Pairing learners 1
0.7%
27 Group work, in pairs 1
0.7%
28 Group work, paring learners 1
0.7%
29 Have group work 2
1.4%
30 Have group work in class 1
0.7%
31 Have group work in practice 1
0.7%
32 Have group work please 1
0.7%
33 Intentionally groups learners 1
0.7%
34 Interaction with the t/aids/ resources like Picture boos 1
0.7%
35 Involve group activities. 1
0.7%
36 Learner Talk Time 3
2%
37 Learner actively participates during the lesson 1
0.7%
38 Learner' talk time 1
0.7%
39 Learners Talk Time 2
1.4%
40 Learners are clustered at their desks and talk at free will with or without teachers directions 1
0.7%
41 Learners are grouped in desks but do few activities together 1
0.7%
42 Learners are in groups at their desks but limited group work is provided 1
0.7%
43 Learners are intentionally grouped facing each other on their desks 1
0.7%
44 Learners are seated at desks in groups of twos or threes. This is however not intentional as there is no particular group activity assigned 1
0.7%
45 Learners are seated at desks in twos but there's is no group work or turn and talk assigned 1
0.7%
46 Learners are seated silently at their desks 1
0.7%
47 Learners constantly engage in demos, peer learning and group work 1
0.7%
48 Learners engage through group activities 1
0.7%
49 Learners feared the cso 1
0.7%
50 Learners fully participate in groups work discussion 1
0.7%
51 Learners fully involved 1
0.7%
52 Learners interaction with realia 1
0.7%
53 Learners mostly read as either whole class or in rows 1
0.7%
54 Learners seated in groups with some desks facing each other. There is however limited group work at their desks 1
0.7%
55 Learners seem to be seated at desks in groups of three. No group activity is however given at desk or group level 1
0.7%
56 Learners' Talk Time 1
0.7%
57 Manure is distributed to groups for viewing. Teacher should give instructions on how to handle that manure though 1
0.7%
58 Moving to groups assisting learners 1
0.7%
59 No group work perse but learners actively engaged in question answer and peer teaching 1
0.7%
60 Not even a single text book found in class 1
0.7%
61 Provide adequate text books 1
0.7%
62 Reading in groups 1
0.7%
63 Shoot Key inquiry questions 1
0.7%
64 Small groups in of three are evident where learners conduct turn and talk 1
0.7%
65 Some learners discuss while others don't 1
0.7%
66 Some learners worked in groups out of own volition while others were not sure whether to work in groups or not 1
0.7%
67 Talk Time 5
3.4%
68 Talk time 5
3.4%
69 Talk time - group work 1
0.7%
70 Talk time activities 1
0.7%
71 Tasks are shared 1
0.7%
72 The children were intentionally grouped on their desks to work on counting activities 1
0.7%
73 The group discussion needed clear directions 1
0.7%
74 The teacher really engages the groups in targeted measurement activities. She needs to ensure learners who get bored with listening can stand and peer teach the rest 1
0.7%
75 The teacher uses group work once but ensures the directions are explicit 1
0.7%
76 There is evident group work and peer learning. The transitions could be better 1
0.7%
77 There is evidently learner talk time but the teacher stalks over their discussions as well 1
0.7%
78 There is group work per table but as the teacher monitors one table the other tables are offtask 1
0.7%
79 There is ni group work observed 1
0.7%
80 Through discussions 1
0.7%
81 Time talk 1
0.7%
82 Use group work 1
0.7%
83 Use group work for lesson effectiveness 1
0.7%
84 Use of group work seen 1
0.7%
85 Visit groups 2
1.4%
86 Visiting groups 1
0.7%
87 Visiting learners in groups 1
0.7%
88 Well done 1
0.7%
89 Well summarised work 1
0.7%
Sysmiss 35
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
RELI Microdata

© RELI Microdata, All Rights Reserved.